Taxation and the Family: What is the Earned Income Tax Credit?
The earned income tax credit (EITC) provides a subsidy for low-income working families. The credit equals a fixed percentage of earnings from the first dollar of earnings until the credit reaches a maximum; both the percentage and the maximum credit depend on the number of children in the family. The credit then stays flat at that maximum as earnings continue to rise, but eventually earnings reach a phase-out range. From that point the credit falls with each additional dollar of income until it disappears entirely (figures 1 and 2). The phaseout begins at a higher income for married couples than for single parents. The credit is fully refundable: any excess beyond a family’s income tax liability is paid as a tax refund.
- Families with three or more children may receive a credit of up to $6,044 in 2013. The maximum credit is $5,372 for families with two children, $3,250 for families with one child, and just $487 for those without children.
- In addition, 24 states and the District of Columbia administered their own state EITCs in 2012. States typically offer the EITC as a fixed percentage of the federal credit. The EITC is refundable in 21 states and the District of Columbia.
- After the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), the EITC is the largest cash or near cash assistance program targeted at low-income families. TPC estimates that almost 26 million households will receive a total of $60 billion in reduced taxes and refunds in 2013 (Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center Microsimulation Model, version 0412-8). The IRS estimates that in 2009, the credit lifted nearly 7 million people out of poverty, including over 3 million children. The IRS also reports that more than three-fourths of eligible families claimed the Earned Income Tax Credit in 2009, a much higher take-up rate than that for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (40 percent in 2005) or for SNAP (60 percent in 2005).
- The EITC has been successful at encouraging people, particularly single mothers, to take jobs. Its effectiveness at increasing hours worked is more ambiguous.
- Critics complain that the EITC is too complex, forcing potential recipients to seek help filing their federal tax return: two-thirds of low-income parents get such assistance, typically from paid tax preparers.
- The credit’s complexity may also contribute to its relatively high error rate. In 2011 the IRS reported that about a quarter of EITC claims ($11-$13 billion annually) are paid out in error. Misreporting of income is the principal error made by tax filers claiming the credit.
- The EITC imposes significant marriage penalties on some families. If a single parent receiving the EITC marries, the addition of the spouse’s income may reduce or eliminate the credit. To address this issue, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 raised the income level at which the EITC begins to phase out for couples to $3,000 above that for single filers. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) increased that amount to $5,000 for 2009 and indexed that threshold to inflation. The Tax Relief Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 extended ARRA’s EITC provisions through 2012. In 2012, the American Taxpayer Relief Act temporarily extended the ARRA provisions through 2017, and permanently extended the EGTRRA provision. In 2013, the phaseout threshold for joint filers will be $5,340 higher than that for singles.
- Several reforms to the EITC have been proposed. One would increase the credit for childless workers to an amount closer to that for families with children; that would provide much-needed assistance for many additional poor workers.
- The EITC could also be consolidated with other tax provisions benefiting families with children into a single family credit, with lower phaseout rates and a uniform definition of who counts as a child. That could simplify tax filing and increase the assistance provided to working families with children.
- Seperating the EITC into two parts—one directed at providing an incentive to work and the other at costs associated with raising children—could both increase work effort and provide more assistance for needy families with children.